H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Gastao Elias vs Radu Albot H2H: 1-1

Gastao Elias and Radu Albot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gastao Elias leads 1–0 on clay, while Radu Albot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gastao Elias won the 2017 Open 13 Provence round of 32 2-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gastao Elias
Portugal Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Radu Albot
Moldova Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gastao Elias #125 2-6 6-4 6-2 Radu Albot #86 Match data May 25, 2017* R32 Open 13 Provence ATP 250 Clay
Radu Albot #110 3-6 6-2 7-5 6-4 Gastao Elias #92 Match data Jun 29, 2016* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gastao Elias #499 #57 831 1,738 24 45 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Radu Albot #497 #39 1,137 1,896 90 140 39.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gastao Elias Radu Albot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–1 0.0% #578 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 0–1 0.0% #172 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 0–1 0.0% #139 1,365 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #175 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2014 3–6 33.3% #132 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2015 0–2 0.0% #133 1,542 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% #168 1,606 0 0
25 2016 12–13 48.0% #81 1,681 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% #121 1,614 0 0
26 2017 5–11 31.2% #115 1,648 0 0 2016 4–11 26.7% #97 1,675 0 0
27 2018 2–6 25.0% #263 1,551 0 0 2017 9–17 34.6% #87 1,670 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 12–23 34.3% #98 1,714 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 31–26 54.4% #46 1,816 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #93 1,732 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–15 28.6% #123 1,570 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 9–10 47.4% #103 1,662 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2023 7–12 36.8% #131 1,648 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2024 3–7 30.0% #163 1,674 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #434 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gastao Elias Radu Albot
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2016 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 6 14 20 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 23 17 40 57.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 8 13 38.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 4 14 18 22.2% 20 28 48 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — 61 86 147 41.5% 21 38 59 35.6% 8 16 24 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 67/69 of Gastao Elias's and 227/230 of Radu Albot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gastao Elias Radu Albot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 28.3% 53.3% 39.5% 50.0% — 43.4% 27.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1/1 4.0 3.0 47.3% 48.6% 59.0% 28.6% 60.0% 54.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1/1 4.0 5.0 58.2% 75.5% 39.5% 50.0% 57.1% 60.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1/1 3.0 7.0 55.2% 69.0% 46.8% 64.3% 75.0% 59.0% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 5/5 1.2 3.0 50.3% 61.6% 51.4% 62.6% 59.0% 56.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 9/9 5.7 3.0 49.1% 67.0% 45.8% 61.0% 40.2% 55.5% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 2/2 3.0 4.0 49.0% 68.5% 55.0% 37.5% 36.7% 61.7% 36.0% 2014 5/5 1.6 3.4 65.9% 63.1% 42.1% 63.5% 39.3% 56.6% 38.8%
25 2016 23/25 3.8 2.1 53.0% 68.6% 53.4% 53.6% 46.3% 61.4% 37.5% 2015 5/5 1.0 3.0 65.1% 59.1% 37.6% 42.6% 38.4% 51.7% 39.0%
26 2017 16/16 4.1 3.0 52.7% 72.4% 48.2% 53.0% 32.6% 60.9% 34.5% 2016 13/15 2.2 3.2 66.2% 61.1% 48.7% 55.0% 46.8% 56.9% 36.0%
27 2018 8/8 2.8 4.1 53.7% 68.2% 44.7% 47.6% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2017 26/26 3.0 2.9 62.8% 66.2% 50.6% 48.3% 43.6% 60.2% 35.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 35/35 2.4 3.3 65.2% 65.9% 49.5% 55.6% 39.4% 60.0% 36.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 57/57 3.4 2.6 63.0% 67.2% 53.0% 55.2% 43.3% 61.9% 37.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 16/17 1.7 3.1 61.8% 64.9% 49.3% 53.7% 39.5% 59.2% 37.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 21/21 3.0 3.9 63.0% 64.4% 45.7% 51.9% 34.6% 57.2% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/19 3.4 3.1 63.6% 69.1% 49.8% 60.8% 36.8% 62.4% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 19/19 2.3 2.9 62.8% 65.5% 46.6% 55.4% 34.5% 58.7% 35.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 10/10 3.2 3.7 64.5% 66.3% 50.0% 51.2% 38.0% 60.7% 36.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.0% 51.0% 54.0% 20.0% 33.0% 52.0% 32.0%
Career — 67/69 3.8 2.9 51.8% 68.3% 49.5% 53.6% 42.1% 59.2% 36.5% — 227/230 2.7 3.1 63.6% 65.7% 49.5% 54.1% 40.1% 59.8% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gastao Elias Radu Albot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2006 1493 94.3 -1.30 +0.13 0.493 36.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1461 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1417 95.1 -3.92 -0.12 0.884 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1441 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1454 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1455 98.1 -0.65 -1.19 1.044 50.8% — — — — — — — — +0.17 2010 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1366 97.0 +1.14 -2.10 0.784 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12 2011 1497 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1519 115.9 -2.88 +0.45 0.820 46.7% — +51 — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 2012 1466 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 1659 124.7 -3.30 -0.67 0.874 47.4% — +53 — 36.4% -1.23 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09 2013 1438 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1542 102.1 -0.77 -1.80 0.939 48.3% — — — 37.5% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.12 2014 1607 122.1 -2.31 -0.70 0.894 47.8% — +40 — 35.7% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.21
25 2016 1682 137.4 -1.35 +0.32 0.972 49.5% -192 +187 — 46.6% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.18 2015 1614 123.1 -2.79 +0.03 0.807 45.7% +3 — — 30.8% -1.54 0–1 1–0 — -0.35
26 2017 1648 126.9 -2.22 -0.56 0.882 47.4% -120 +116 — 35.7% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.37 2016 1676 124.8 -4.13 -0.78 0.836 47.2% -39 -7 — 34.9% -0.81 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.16
27 2018 1552 109.6 -2.57 -0.56 0.848 46.7% — +155 — 26.3% -1.26 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2017 1670 129.9 -2.66 -1.11 0.896 48.1% -17 -38 -35 40.3% -0.61 2–5 (29%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.49
28 2019 1541 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1714 135.8 -3.43 +1.06 0.911 48.2% -18 -113 -36 37.5% -0.58 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.10
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1817 153.0 -1.61 +1.82 0.993 50.0% +29 -125 -190 52.1% -0.06 10–10 (50%) 18–10 (64%) — -0.81
30 2021 1557 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1732 124.6 -1.95 +0.59 0.918 47.9% +30 -87 — 42.9% -0.50 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.67
31 2022 1542 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1571 116.4 -4.13 -1.09 0.825 46.4% +75 +15 — 33.3% -1.05 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.63
32 2023 1541 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1663 128.4 -1.24 +0.24 0.983 49.7% +11 — +47 50.0% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.06
33 2024 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1648 124.0 -3.20 -0.54 0.864 47.6% -30 +19 — 33.3% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1674 122.8 -1.89 +1.37 0.932 48.4% -6 — — 33.3% -0.70 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1577 102.9 -0.87 -4.65 0.667 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03
Career — 1738 120.9 -2.05 -0.25 0.895 47.9% -163 +130 — 37.5% -0.83 9–14 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 97.6 -0.62 — 1896 133.7 -2.56 +0.39 0.914 48.4% +10 -59 -48 41.3% -0.55 34–41 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 102.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.