H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Steve Johnson H2H: 0-1
Steve Johnson holds a 1–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-3 6-4 | Gastao Elias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,738 | 25 | 46 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,989 | 199 | 202 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #81 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,949 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #33 | 1,890 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,571 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |