H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Gastao Elias vs Thanasi Kokkinakis H2H: 1-0
Gastao Elias holds a 1–0 lead over Thanasi Kokkinakis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gastao Elias leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gastao Elias won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Portugal
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Gastao Elias | 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | Thanasi Kokkinakis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastao Elias | #499 | #57 | 831 | 1,738 | 25 | 46 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thanasi Kokkinakis | #456 | #65 | 802 | 1,873 | 73 | 92 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gastao Elias | Thanasi Kokkinakis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #150 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #209 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #81 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #115 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #93 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #263 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #454 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #456 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |