H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Albert Portas H2H: 3-1
Gaston Gaudio holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gaston Gaudio leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2006 Acapulco third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 7-5 6-2 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2006* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1999* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-4 7-6(3) | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |