H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Andrei Stoliarov H2H: 1-1
Gaston Gaudio and Andrei Stoliarov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Stoliarov leads 1–0 on clay, while Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2002 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2002* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Gaston Gaudio | 7-5 6-1 | Andrei Stoliarov | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2000* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Stoliarov | 6-3 6-0 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Andrei Stoliarov | #1,504 | #71 | 569 | 1,647 | 35 | 58 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Andrei Stoliarov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #81 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #187 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |