H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-1
David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Gaston Gaudio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Paris Masters second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2000* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-2 6-1 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |