H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 1-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Korolev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2006 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2009 | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Evgeny Korolev | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Evgeny Korolev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Evgeny Korolev | #1,762 | #46 | 1,012 | 1,791 | 72 | 91 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Evgeny Korolev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #106 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #140 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #329 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |