H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Harel Levy H2H: 1-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Harel Levy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2001 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2001* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 7-5 6-2 | Harel Levy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Harel Levy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |