H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2002 Roland Garros third round 6-2 4-6 6-4 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-2 4-6 6-4 3-1 (ret.) | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |