H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2000 Canada Masters second round 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gaston Gaudio | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |