H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Julien Boutter H2H: 2-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 2–0 lead over Julien Boutter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2002 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 7-6(6) 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2002* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Gaston Gaudio | 7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | Julien Boutter | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2000* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-3 7-5 | Julien Boutter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Julien Boutter | #1,092 | #46 | 790 | 1,817 | 62 | 84 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Julien Boutter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #276 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #110 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #597 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |