H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2005 Australian Open first round 7-6(3) 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gaston Gaudio | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-3 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |