H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Gaston Gaudio vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 0-3

Markus Hipfl holds a 3–0 lead over Gaston Gaudio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Markus Hipfl leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2002 Chile Open round of 16 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gaston Gaudio
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Markus Hipfl #68 6-4 7-6(4) Gaston Gaudio #45 Match data Feb 15, 2002* R16 Chile Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Markus Hipfl #73 7-5 6-1 Gaston Gaudio #72 Match data Sep 16, 1999* R32 Mallorca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Markus Hipfl #81 6-3 6-1 Gaston Gaudio #67 Match data Jul 8, 1999* R32 Swedish Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gaston Gaudio #1,025 #5 2,440 1,995 253 189 57.2% 1 0 0 2 5 8
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gaston Gaudio Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 1999 8–15 34.8% #72 1,531 0 0 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 2000 27–25 51.9% #34 1,648 0 0 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 2001 23–23 50.0% #48 1,691 0 0 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 2002 39–17 69.6% #21 1,828 0 2 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 2003 34–23 59.6% #34 1,764 0 2 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 2004 35–24 59.3% #10 1,805 1 3 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 2005 54–20 73.0% #10 1,869 1 8 — — — — — — —
27 2006 26–20 56.5% #34 1,697 1 8 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 2007 6–15 28.6% #182 1,625 1 8 — — — — — — —
29 2008 0–1 0.0% #969 1,605 1 8 — — — — — — —
30 2009 1–5 16.7% #167 1,525 1 8 — — — — — — —
31 2010 0–1 0.0% #326 1,467 1 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gaston Gaudio Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 12 9 21 57.1% 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 27 12 39 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 29 12 41 70.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2005 8 9 17 47.1% 41 7 48 85.4% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 5 6 11 45.5% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 66 114 42.1% 193 103 296 65.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 10 14 24 41.7% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/442 of Gaston Gaudio's and 116/133 of Markus Hipfl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gaston Gaudio Markus Hipfl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 1.0 6.0 66.2% 57.8% 39.1% 71.4% 0.0% 51.5% 27.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 2.0 6.0 49.1% 51.9% 39.3% 16.7% 20.0% 45.5% 34.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 1.7 4.3 43.0% 62.8% 49.0% 60.8% 40.6% 54.8% 40.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/2 1.0 2.0 50.9% 62.1% 44.6% 50.0% 80.0% 53.5% 46.3%
20 1999 21/23 2.1 3.5 58.6% 61.3% 49.4% 54.6% 44.0% 56.2% 40.6% 1998 5/6 2.4 1.6 67.6% 60.0% 50.6% 51.0% 33.6% 56.7% 38.8%
21 2000 42/52 2.2 3.1 60.8% 66.4% 47.8% 56.3% 44.2% 59.0% 39.9% 1999 26/30 2.3 1.8 66.3% 66.5% 49.6% 37.2% 42.6% 61.0% 42.0%
22 2001 41/46 3.2 2.7 60.3% 68.6% 52.0% 60.6% 40.5% 62.0% 38.1% 2000 16/20 2.1 2.2 64.6% 64.9% 50.9% 54.0% 52.2% 59.7% 39.1%
23 2002 47/56 3.9 2.4 62.9% 70.4% 55.2% 57.1% 49.1% 64.4% 42.2% 2001 26/32 2.1 2.9 61.4% 63.6% 48.6% 51.5% 38.5% 58.1% 39.9%
24 2003 54/57 2.8 2.9 63.0% 67.1% 50.6% 52.2% 46.0% 61.0% 40.8% 2002 27/28 3.3 2.2 65.1% 63.3% 50.1% 50.8% 46.7% 58.2% 39.0%
25 2004 59/59 2.4 3.0 63.1% 68.5% 49.9% 57.0% 47.5% 61.7% 41.8% 2003 9/9 0.9 1.9 71.7% 56.3% 41.2% 46.4% 38.4% 52.0% 33.3%
26 2005 73/74 2.8 2.9 62.1% 68.4% 52.3% 60.7% 45.0% 62.2% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 46/46 2.8 3.6 61.9% 68.2% 49.1% 55.6% 43.3% 61.0% 40.8% 2005 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.1% 60.4% 48.4% 71.4% 40.0% 56.0% 39.0%
28 2007 20/21 1.3 5.1 60.9% 62.6% 44.4% 44.9% 42.0% 55.4% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 53.1% 30.8% 47.8% 33.3% 40.0% 38.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 6/6 1.7 5.0 64.9% 62.2% 40.2% 53.9% 54.7% 54.8% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1/1 3.0 1.0 75.6% 63.2% 68.2% 81.8% 16.7% 64.4% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 411/442 2.7 3.1 62.0% 67.4% 50.5% 56.4% 45.1% 60.9% 41.0% — 116/133 2.3 2.4 64.2% 63.4% 48.8% 48.3% 42.9% 58.2% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gaston Gaudio Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1999 1532 120.2 -3.16 +1.21 0.925 48.6% — +61 — 33.3% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.13 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 2000 1648 139.2 -1.88 +1.92 0.975 49.6% -157 +157 — 50.8% -0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–4 (71%) — -0.67 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 2001 1691 142.7 -0.10 +0.88 1.001 50.0% -102 +74 — 51.7% -0.01 6–11 (35%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.14 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 2002 1828 154.5 +2.21 +3.81 1.188 53.1% -81 +154 — 64.1% +0.82 11–6 (65%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.72 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 2003 1764 144.0 +0.25 +2.55 1.046 50.7% -73 +146 — 56.0% +0.41 17–10 (63%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.01 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 2004 1806 148.5 +0.07 +4.61 1.092 51.5% -162 +199 — 58.0% +0.48 9–11 (45%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.50 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 2005 1870 154.2 +0.77 +5.42 1.158 52.8% -146 +244 — 65.7% +0.95 16–6 (73%) 11–10 (52%) — +1.99 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1697 131.9 -1.41 +2.09 1.047 50.8% -45 +240 — 55.4% +0.22 9–9 (50%) 7–6 (54%) — +3.39 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 2007 1626 110.3 -4.55 -0.35 0.804 45.1% -16 +88 — 31.5% -1.76 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1605 96.3 -2.10 -4.49 0.605 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1525 113.6 -2.51 -0.87 0.865 46.9% — +95 — 25.0% -1.81 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1467 98.5 -3.63 -2.53 0.978 49.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1995 147.2 -0.36 +2.93 1.049 50.8% -111 +165 — 54.9% +0.22 82–74 (53%) 74–69 (52%) 99.3 +0.46 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.