H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Michal Tabara H2H: 2-0
Gaston Gaudio holds a 2–0 lead over Michal Tabara in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2005 Estoril fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2005* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-2 6-1 | Michal Tabara | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2001* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gaston Gaudio | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Michal Tabara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Michal Tabara | #1,290 | #47 | 773 | 1,686 | 39 | 52 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Michal Tabara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #123 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #64 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #210 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2005 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |