H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gaston Gaudio vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Gaston Gaudio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 Acapulco third round 2-6 7-5 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2005* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Zib | 2-6 7-5 (ret.) | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gaston Gaudio | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |