H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gene Mayer vs Jeff Borowiak H2H: 3-1
Gene Mayer holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Borowiak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Gene Mayer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gene Mayer won the 1982 Memphis second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1982* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Gene Mayer | 6-4 6-2 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1979* | Rancho Mirage | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Gene Mayer | 6-2 6-2 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1978* | Maui | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gene Mayer | 6-4 6-2 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1977* | Los Angeles Psw | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jeff Borowiak | 6-3 6-4 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene Mayer | #976 | #4 | 6 | 2,198 | 311 | 159 | 66.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Jeff Borowiak | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,941 | 289 | 305 | 48.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gene Mayer | Jeff Borowiak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #142 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 20–28 | 41.7% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,979 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 21–33 | 38.9% | #82 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 71–16 | 81.6% | #5 | 2,139 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #40 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1981 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1982 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,069 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #60 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1983 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #10 | 1,964 | 0 | 14 | 1977 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,812 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1984 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 14 | 1978 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #98 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,863 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #125 | 1,614 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,841 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #94 | 1,740 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,598 | 0 | 5 |