H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gene Mayer vs Kim Warwick H2H: 0-1

Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Gene Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1978 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 0-6 6-0 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gene Mayer
USA Age 70 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #36 7-5 0-6 6-0 2-6 6-4 Gene Mayer #59 Match data Jun 28, 1978* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gene Mayer #976 #4 6 2,208 309 157 66.3% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gene Mayer Kim Warwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0
19 1975 6–10 37.5% #144 1,541 0 0 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0
20 1976 17–16 51.5% #48 1,702 0 0 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0
21 1977 17–27 38.6% #86 1,692 0 0 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0
22 1978 25–18 58.1% #64 1,734 0 1 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0
23 1979 54–25 68.4% #12 1,981 0 2 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0
24 1980 69–14 83.1% #5 2,154 0 7 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1
25 1981 37–8 82.2% #7 2,073 0 11 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1
26 1982 33–11 75.0% #7 2,076 0 12 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1
27 1983 25–10 71.4% #10 1,967 0 14 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2
28 1984 24–15 61.5% #18 1,874 0 14 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3
29 1985 2–1 66.7% #368 1,864 0 14 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3
30 1986 0–1 0.0% #870 1,842 0 14 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gene Mayer Kim Warwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
19 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
20 1976 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — —
21 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1978 6 4 10 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1979 26 8 34 76.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 9 21 57.1% 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9%
24 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 34 5 39 87.2% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2%
25 1981 18 3 21 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 5 0 5 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1983 17 5 22 77.3% — — — — — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 41 156 73.7% 74 48 122 60.7% 15 13 28 53.6% 105 55 160 65.6% — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gene Mayer Kim Warwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1973 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.19 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42
19 1975 1541 117.6 — — — — +18 +30 — 38.9% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.55 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86
20 1976 1703 134.8 — — — — -5 -55 — 50.7% +0.17 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.87 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23
21 1977 1693 140.3 — — — — -13 -6 -198 41.8% -0.74 5–3 (63%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.29 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
22 1978 1734 142.4 — — — — -21 +21 -205 60.8% +1.16 3–8 (27%) 3–6 (33%) — +2.25 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10
23 1979 1982 164.8 — — — — +59 -89 -319 65.6% +1.04 10–9 (53%) 8–5 (62%) — -4.23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45
24 1980 2154 169.4 — — — — +68 -228 -359 78.3% +2.22 12–0 (100%) 9–5 (64%) — -2.23 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01
25 1981 2073 158.2 — — — — +97 -180 — 84.9% +2.44 2–4 (33%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.66 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00
26 1982 2076 160.9 — — — — +32 -135 -210 75.5% +1.96 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.35 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65
27 1983 1968 152.8 — — — — +26 — — 65.4% +0.98 6–1 (86%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.12 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20
28 1984 1874 154.0 — — — — +82 +43 — 59.8% +0.67 5–3 (63%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.60 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21
29 1985 1865 112.4 — — — — +71 — — 62.5% +1.13 1–1 — — +0.53 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26
30 1986 1842 106.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.11 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23
Career — 2209 161.8 — — — — +47 -53 -263 65.3% +1.15 52–40 (57%) 51–44 (54%) 101.0 -1.58 — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.