H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Geoff Masters vs Cliff Richey H2H: 1-1
Geoff Masters and Cliff Richey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Geoff Masters leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cliff Richey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Geoff Masters won the 1976 Sao Paulo Wct fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1976* | Sao Paulo Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Geoff Masters | 6-3 7-6(5) | Cliff Richey | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Cliff Richey | 3-6 6-3 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Geoff Masters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geoff Masters | #826 | #41 | 0 | 1,881 | 238 | 255 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Geoff Masters | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1973 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1974 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1975 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1976 | 27–31 | 46.6% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1977 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #78 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #62 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1980 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |