H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Geoff Masters vs Rod Laver H2H: 1-2
Rod Laver holds a 2–1 lead over Geoff Masters in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–0 on clay, while Geoff Masters leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Geoff Masters won the 1976 Richmond Wct fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1976* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Geoff Masters | 6-1 6-1 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1973* | Tehran | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Rod Laver | 7-6 6-3 | Geoff Masters | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1973* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Rod Laver | 6-3 6-0 | Geoff Masters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geoff Masters | #826 | #41 | 0 | 1,881 | 238 | 255 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Geoff Masters | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 27–31 | 46.6% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #78 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #62 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |