H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
George Bastl vs Michal Tabara H2H: 0-1
Michal Tabara holds a 1–0 lead over George Bastl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Tabara leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Tabara won the 2001 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Michal Tabara | 6-4 6-1 | George Bastl | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Tabara | #1,290 | #47 | 773 | 1,686 | 39 | 52 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | George Bastl | Michal Tabara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #123 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #64 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #210 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |