H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
George Bastl vs Nathan Healey H2H: 1-0
George Bastl holds a 1–0 lead over Nathan Healey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, George Bastl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 2006 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | George Bastl | 6-3 6-0 | Nathan Healey | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nathan Healey | #1,134 | #159 | 268 | 1,579 | 6 | 13 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | George Bastl | Nathan Healey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #241 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |