H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Georges Goven vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-1
Georges Goven holds a 2–1 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Georges Goven leads 2–0 on clay, while Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Georges Goven won the 1973 Indianapolis fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1973 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Georges Goven | 6-1 6-2 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1973* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Georges Goven | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1972* | Omaha | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 6-2 | Georges Goven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georges Goven | #783 | #56 | 0 | 1,871 | 203 | 230 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Georges Goven | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 30–15 | 66.7% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 16–24 | 40.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #83 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1979 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #203 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1980 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #151 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1982 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,445 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #252 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |