H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Georges Goven vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 2-0
Georges Goven holds a 2–0 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Georges Goven leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Georges Goven won the 1974 Roland Garros first round 7-5 4-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1974* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Georges Goven | 7-5 4-6 9-7 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1973 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Georges Goven | 7-5 6-3 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georges Goven | #783 | #56 | 0 | 1,871 | 203 | 230 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Georges Goven | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1968 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1969 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 30–15 | 66.7% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1971 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1972 | 16–24 | 40.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1973 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1974 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #83 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1975 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1976 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1977 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1979 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #203 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 1980 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #151 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |
| 34 | 1982 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,445 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #252 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |