H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Georges Goven vs Tom Okker H2H: 0-4
Tom Okker holds a 4–0 lead over Georges Goven in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1974 Rotterdam fourth round 6-0 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1974* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | Georges Goven | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Tom Okker | 6-2 6-2 7-5 | Georges Goven | Match data |
| May 16, 1969* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tom Okker | 6-1 6-1 | Georges Goven | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1968 | King's Cup 2r | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-0 6-3 | Georges Goven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georges Goven | #783 | #56 | 0 | 1,871 | 203 | 230 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Georges Goven | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 30–15 | 66.7% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 16–24 | 40.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1973 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1974 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #83 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1975 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1976 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | 1977 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1979 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #203 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | 1980 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #151 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | 1982 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,445 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #252 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |