H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
German Puentes vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0
German Puentes holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, German Puentes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, German Puentes won the 2001 Casablanca fourth round 6-1 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2001* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | German Puentes | 6-1 2-6 7-5 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| German Puentes | #1,348 | #90 | 470 | 1,562 | 13 | 28 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | German Puentes | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #109 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |