H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 1-1
Gianluca Pozzi and Anders Jarryd are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anders Jarryd leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 1992 Vienna third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1992* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Gianluca Pozzi | 6-3 6-4 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anders Jarryd | 6-4 7-6 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Anders Jarryd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |