H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 0-2
Andrei Cherkasov holds a 2–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Cherkasov leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1994 Tel Aviv fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1994* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 7-5 6-2 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1993* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-2 6-1 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |