H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Gianluca Pozzi vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-1

Gianluca Pozzi and Cedric Pioline are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1994 Bordeaux round of 16 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #26 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-4 Gianluca Pozzi #107 Match data Sep 16, 1994* R16 Bordeaux ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gianluca Pozzi #73 5-7 6-4 7-6(3) Cedric Pioline #52 Match data Feb 6, 1992* R32 Milan ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5
34 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.72 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +1.01 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 104.0 -0.02 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) 106.9 +0.05 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -1.02 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 102.3 +1.46 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 95.3 +0.52 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.29 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 101.5 +0.09 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
34 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) 97.0 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) 108.8 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 91.1 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.