H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 0-3
Gilad Bloom holds a 3–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1992 Canada Masters second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1992* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-1 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1990* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-2 6-1 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1989* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |