H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gianluca Pozzi vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-2

Gianluca Pozzi holds a 4–2 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 2001 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-2 6-0.

ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Gianluca Pozzi #44 6-2 6-0 Jeff Tarango #116 Match data
Aug 5, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Gianluca Pozzi #62 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 Jeff Tarango #59 Match data
Oct 16, 1997* Ostrava ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jeff Tarango #47 6-1 6-4 Gianluca Pozzi #112 Match data
Apr 26, 1996* Seoul ATP 250 R16 Hard Gianluca Pozzi #114 6-3 7-5 Jeff Tarango #83 Match data
Jan 13, 1994* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #94 4-6 6-4 6-2 Gianluca Pozzi #116 Match data
Mar 14, 1992* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Gianluca Pozzi #60 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 172 257 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,533 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,461 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,709 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,559 0 1 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,607 0 1 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,554 0 1 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,603 0 1
35 2000 26–22 54.2% #43 1,728 0 1
36 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,495 0 1