H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Gianluca Pozzi vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-2

Gianluca Pozzi holds a 4–2 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 2001 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gianluca Pozzi #44 6-2 6-0 Jeff Tarango #116 Match data Mar 14, 2001* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Gianluca Pozzi #62 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 Jeff Tarango #59 Match data Aug 5, 1998* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jeff Tarango #47 6-1 6-4 Gianluca Pozzi #112 Match data Oct 16, 1997* R32 Ostrava World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Gianluca Pozzi #114 6-3 7-5 Jeff Tarango #83 Match data Apr 26, 1996* R16 Seoul World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jeff Tarango #94 4-6 6-4 6-2 Gianluca Pozzi #116 Match data Jan 13, 1994* R32 ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gianluca Pozzi #60 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #52 Match data Mar 14, 1992* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2
34 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
34 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.