H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 1-0
Gianluca Pozzi holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 1992 Memphis second round 6-2 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1992* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Gianluca Pozzi | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Jimmy Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |