H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gianluca Pozzi vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 0-1

Markus Hipfl holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2001 Eastbourne Open round of 32 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Markus Hipfl #90 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Gianluca Pozzi #70 Match data Jun 21, 2001* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.