H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 0-1
Markus Hipfl holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2001 Nottingham third round 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2001* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Markus Hipfl | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |