Gianluca Pozzi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 14, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi holds a 2–1 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1996 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-3 6-2 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data | Apr 12, 1996* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Gianluca Pozzi | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Jul 20, 1995* | R32 | Washington Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Gianluca Pozzi | 3-6 6-2 7-6(6) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Jul 21, 1993* | R64 | Washington Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 173 | 258 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gianluca Pozzi | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #43 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Gianluca Pozzi | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1991 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1992 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 48.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1993 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1994 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 1995 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1998 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 105 | 149 | 254 | 41.3% | 6 | 34 | 40 | 15.0% | 32 | 36 | 68 | 47.1% | 30 | 39 | 69 | 43.5% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Gianluca Pozzi | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1480 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | +0.06 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1987 | 1501 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.25 | — | — | -0.04 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 1988 | 1508 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | +0.72 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | +0.36 |
| 1989 | 1532 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | +1.01 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.5 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -90 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | +0.32 |
| 1990 | 1460 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 22.7% | -2.14 | 0–2 | 3–0 (100%) | +0.87 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | +1.30 |
| 1991 | 1696 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | -142 | 52.8% | +0.04 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | -0.20 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | -0.09 |
| 1992 | 1709 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -218 | -129 | 46.6% | -0.12 | 17–7 (71%) | 6–10 (38%) | +0.45 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | -0.19 |
| 1993 | 1560 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | +12 | 35.1% | -1.37 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–4 (73%) | -0.71 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | +2.22 |
| 1994 | 1608 | 117.5 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | -94 | 40.5% | -0.71 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | +1.73 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | +0.62 |
| 1995 | 1555 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +2 | 35.1% | -1.13 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | +0.71 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | -0.25 |
| 1996 | 1531 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | +61 | 37.3% | -0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | +0.39 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | -0.47 |
| 1997 | 1509 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.36 | 1–1 | 2–0 | +0.87 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | +0.49 |
| 1998 | 1654 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -252 | -36 | 46.2% | -0.16 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–9 (47%) | +0.35 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | +0.78 |
| 1999 | 1602 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -205 | +16 | 41.8% | -0.45 | 6–11 (35%) | 4–5 (44%) | +0.10 | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | -0.20 |
| 2000 | 1725 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -313 | +22 | 50.8% | +0.11 | 12–8 (60%) | 12–5 (71%) | -1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1494 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -133 | +119 | 28.8% | -1.23 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1486 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1784 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -227 | -13 | 41.5% | -0.58 | 69–75 (48%) | 67–61 (52%) | +1.27 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | +1.39 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |