H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Gianluca Pozzi vs Nicolas Pereira H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Pereira holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Pereira leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Pereira won the 1990 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicolas Pereira
VEN Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Pereira #159 6-1 6-3 Gianluca Pozzi #179 Match data Aug 8, 1990* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicolas Pereira #1,101 #74 658 1,690 64 115 35.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Nicolas Pereira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 2–2 50.0% #151 1,526 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 12–21 36.4% #121 1,582 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 5–15 25.0% #238 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 2–6 25.0% #145 1,483 0 0
21 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #129 1,466 0 0
22 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0 1993 4–11 26.7% #142 1,472 0 0
23 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0 1994 10–14 41.7% #116 1,547 0 1
24 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0 1995 14–18 43.8% #122 1,610 0 1
25 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0 1996 15–20 42.9% #110 1,570 0 2
26 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1 1997 0–7 0.0% #472 1,489 0 2
27 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Nicolas Pereira
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 12 21 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 7 11 18 38.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5% — 33 61 94 35.1% 15 26 41 36.6% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Nicolas Pereira
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1527 112.7 — — — — — — — 55.6% +0.22 0–1 1–1 — -0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1583 133.9 — — — — +11 -61 -18 42.2% -0.60 2–7 (22%) 10–6 (63%) 101.5 -1.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1504 113.9 — — — — +43 -15 — 30.6% -1.25 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) 97.7 +0.53
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1483 107.0 -0.60 -1.86 0.833 47.2% +34 — — 31.6% -0.90 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.4 +0.13
21 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06 1992 1467 98.9 +0.20 -0.48 0.762 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.23
22 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04 1993 1472 114.4 -1.19 -3.12 0.797 46.3% +45 0 +69 35.7% -1.07 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 +0.31
23 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.72 1994 1547 123.5 +1.64 -3.77 0.880 47.9% -65 +8 +37 42.9% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 102.8 +0.90
24 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +1.01 1995 1610 125.6 +1.27 -1.84 0.956 49.4% -25 -18 — 47.1% -0.32 3–7 (30%) 5–12 (29%) 91.0 +0.61
25 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74 1996 1570 123.0 +1.01 -1.88 0.962 49.1% +2 -46 +100 45.9% -0.53 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 96.1 +1.11
26 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 104.0 -0.02 1997 1489 103.4 -1.59 -3.08 0.679 43.7% +28 — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.21
27 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) 106.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 102.3 +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 95.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 101.5 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) 97.0 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) 108.8 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 91.1 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87 — 1690 127.5 +0.59 -2.43 0.889 48.0% +7 -20 +57 40.6% -0.69 16–36 (31%) 40–48 (45%) 90.2 +1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.