Gianluca Pozzi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 14, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi and Peter Lundgren are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 1988 US Open round of 128 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-3 | Peter Lundgren | Match data | Aug 31, 1988* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Peter Lundgren | 6-4 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data | Jul 27, 1988* | R64 | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 173 | 258 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,713 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,535 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #43 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 1990 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1990 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1991 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1991 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 27 | 1992 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 48.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1992 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1993 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 1995 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 31 | 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 105 | 149 | 254 | 41.3% | 6 | 34 | 40 | 15.0% | 32 | 36 | 68 | 47.1% | 30 | 39 | 69 | 43.5% | — | 81 | 73 | 154 | 52.6% | 1 | 18 | 19 | 5.3% | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 20 | 28 | 48 | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1515 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1671 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.48 | 4–0 (100%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.03 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1480 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 1986 | 1640 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -156 | -99 | 41.6% | -0.36 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.30 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1501 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 | 1987 | 1837 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -397 | — | 58.0% | +0.66 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.26 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1508 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.72 | 1988 | 1738 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | -181 | 48.5% | +0.13 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.19 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1532 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +1.01 | 1989 | 1703 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | -64 | — | +20 | 47.1% | -0.34 | 1–3 (25%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.44 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1460 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 22.7% | -2.14 | 0–2 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.74 | 1990 | 1713 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | -6 | 46.8% | -0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -0.25 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1697 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | -143 | 52.8% | +0.04 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.02 | 1991 | 1610 | 134.1 | -1.57 | -2.37 | 0.850 | 47.2% | +11 | -201 | +101 | 38.8% | -0.51 | 4–6 (40%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.36 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1709 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -217 | -129 | 46.6% | -0.12 | 17–7 (71%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | +0.05 | 1992 | 1580 | 113.5 | -1.29 | -1.70 | 0.876 | 47.8% | +29 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.44 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.85 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1560 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | +12 | 35.1% | -1.37 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–4 (73%) | — | -1.02 | 1993 | 1570 | 104.4 | +0.11 | -1.94 | 1.034 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1608 | 117.5 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | -94 | 40.5% | -0.71 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +1.46 | 1994 | 1534 | 101.7 | -1.08 | -1.39 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +40 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1555 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | +2 | 35.1% | -1.13 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +0.52 | 1995 | 1536 | 100.9 | +2.06 | -2.27 | 1.192 | 52.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1531 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | +61 | 37.3% | -0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 1509 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.36 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1654 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -252 | -36 | 46.2% | -0.16 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 1602 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -205 | +16 | 41.8% | -0.45 | 6–11 (35%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 1725 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -313 | +22 | 50.8% | +0.11 | 12–8 (60%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | -1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 1494 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -133 | +119 | 28.8% | -1.23 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2002 | 1486 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1784 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -227 | -13 | 41.5% | -0.58 | 69–75 (48%) | 67–61 (52%) | 104.3 | +0.87 | — | 1868 | 140.9 | -1.27 | -2.09 | 0.872 | 47.6% | +23 | -231 | -8 | 46.8% | -0.06 | 32–28 (53%) | 34–44 (44%) | 99.2 | +0.16 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 5 | 2 | 7 | Mar 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 10, 1994 | H2H |
| David Pate | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Amos Mansdorf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 15, 1992 | H2H |