H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gianluca Pozzi vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1

Gianluca Pozzi and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on clay, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2001 Tashkent round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sargis Sargsian #103 6-2 7-5 Gianluca Pozzi #118 Match data Sep 14, 2001* R16 Tashkent ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gianluca Pozzi #69 6-3 7-6(4) Sargis Sargsian #86 Match data Apr 23, 1998* R32 Orlando ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gianluca Pozzi Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
21 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39
25 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.49
26 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70
27 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.47
28 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
29 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.86
30 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.63
31 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.22
32 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
34 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.