H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1
Gianluca Pozzi and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on clay, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2001 Tashkent fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2001* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | 6-2 7-5 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1998* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gianluca Pozzi | 6-3 7-6(4) | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |