H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Gianluca Pozzi vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0
Gianluca Pozzi holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(7) 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gianluca Pozzi | 6-3 7-6(7) 6-7(5) 6-1 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianluca Pozzi | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |