H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gianni Ocleppo vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 1-2
Ricardo Cano holds a 2–1 lead over Gianni Ocleppo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ricardo Cano leads 2–0 on clay, while Gianni Ocleppo leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1983 Florence third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 69
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1983* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 6-2 7-6 | Gianni Ocleppo | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1982* | Zurich Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Gianni Ocleppo | 7-6 6-4 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1977* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | Gianni Ocleppo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Ocleppo | #955 | #30 | 0 | 1,806 | 98 | 123 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gianni Ocleppo | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #108 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #94 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #79 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #72 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #47 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |