H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Gilad Bloom vs Christo Van Rensburg H2H: 3-1

Gilad Bloom holds a 3–1 lead over Christo Van Rensburg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Christo Van Rensburg won the 1991 Tel Aviv semifinal 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Christo Van Rensburg
RSA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Christo Van Rensburg 6-3 2-6 6-3 Gilad Bloom #109 Match data Oct 12, 1991* SF Tel Aviv ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gilad Bloom #76 3-6 6-3 6-3 Christo Van Rensburg Match data Feb 20, 1991* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Gilad Bloom #72 2-6 7-6 7-5 Christo Van Rensburg Match data Oct 13, 1990* QF Tel Aviv ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gilad Bloom #181 7-6 4-2 (ret.) Christo Van Rensburg Match data Oct 20, 1989* R16 Tel Aviv ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christo Van Rensburg — — — 1,861 153 154 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilad Bloom Christo Van Rensburg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
21 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,530 0 0
22 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0 1985 3–10 23.1% — 1,535 0 0
23 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0 1986 12–12 50.0% — 1,655 0 0
24 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0 1987 19–12 61.3% — 1,775 0 1
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0 1988 21–15 58.3% — 1,741 0 1
26 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0 1989 26–15 63.4% — 1,822 0 2
27 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0 1990 23–21 52.3% — 1,734 0 2
28 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0 1991 13–13 50.0% — 1,745 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1992 12–22 35.3% — 1,611 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1993 12–17 41.4% — 1,606 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1994 7–8 46.7% — 1,614 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% — 1,592 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilad Bloom Christo Van Rensburg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
22 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9% — 78 86 164 47.6% 1 10 11 9.1% 52 30 82 63.4% 22 28 50 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilad Bloom Christo Van Rensburg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +2.10 1983 1483 98.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.24
21 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 -0.23 1984 1531 113.0 — — — — — — +56 50.0% +0.10 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.55
22 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89 1985 1535 128.7 — — — — +20 — — 34.3% -0.86 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -0.38
23 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) 106.2 -0.07 1986 1656 138.6 — — — — -45 — +40 52.4% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 101.3 -0.19
24 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -1.07 1987 1776 138.8 — — — — -39 — -26 58.8% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 -0.70
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 103.8 +0.91 1988 1742 136.2 — — — — +4 — -14 56.8% +0.70 6–7 (46%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 +0.27
26 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15 1989 1823 144.9 — — — — -37 — +12 63.2% +0.72 5–8 (38%) 10–5 (67%) 101.0 -0.58
27 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05 1990 1734 131.6 — — — — -1 — +91 51.8% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 100.2 +0.08
28 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11 1991 1745 135.7 — — — — -51 — +130 51.4% +0.14 4–7 (36%) 7–4 (64%) 99.5 -1.39
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1611 125.3 — — — — -37 -143 +228 42.7% -0.53 3–9 (25%) 7–6 (54%) 94.0 -1.18
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1606 123.5 — — — — -28 — +213 41.2% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 6–8 (43%) 99.9 +0.91
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1614 109.2 — — — — -69 — +226 43.9% -0.71 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.1 +0.30
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1592 105.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.18
Career — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87 — 1862 139.6 — — — — -26 -143 +86 51.2% +0.11 49–63 (44%) 58–51 (53%) 101.3 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.