H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Gilad Bloom vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-0

Gilad Bloom holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1988 Tel Aviv round of 32 7-6 6-1.

ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilad Bloom #179 7-6 6-1 Damir Keretic #178 Match data Oct 13, 1988* R32 Tel Aviv ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilad Bloom Damir Keretic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0
18 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0
19 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0 1981 3–6 33.3% 1,476 0 0
22 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilad Bloom Damir Keretic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1985 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1986 2 1 3 66.7% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9% 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilad Bloom Damir Keretic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1504 101.0 50.0% -0.25 +0.36
18 1985 1506 101.0 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 +0.41
19 1986 1539 115.3 +41 62.5% +1.25 1–1 +0.23 1979 1496 100.4 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 +0.34
20 1987 1546 112.7 +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) +2.10 1980 1477 97.2 +53 +20 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +1.39
21 1988 1550 124.8 +10 -16 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) -0.23 1981 1477 122.8 +42 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) +0.85
22 1989 1570 117.7 +29 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 +0.89 1982 1618 125.5 +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) +2.82
23 1990 1736 132.7 +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) -0.07 1983 1528 123.9 -63 +44 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) +0.53
24 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) -1.07 1984 1574 127.4 +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 +0.03
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) +0.91 1985 1596 124.5 +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) +1.43
26 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) +0.15 1986 1688 134.4 -143 +52 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) -1.30
27 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% -113 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 -0.05 1987 1694 139.5 -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) -1.52
28 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% 0.0% -3.00 -0.11 1988 1538 120.7 -47 +102 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) -0.37
29 1989 1576 113.3 -37 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.44
Career 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87 1741 133.5 -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.