H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Dan Goldie H2H: 0-2
Dan Goldie holds a 2–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dan Goldie won the 1990 Hong Kong third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1990* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dan Goldie | 6-3 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1987* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Dan Goldie | 7-6 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |