H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gilad Bloom vs Dan Goldie H2H: 0-2

Dan Goldie holds a 2–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dan Goldie won the 1990 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Dan Goldie
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dan Goldie #70 6-3 6-3 Gilad Bloom #87 Match data Apr 26, 1990* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Dan Goldie #113 7-6 6-4 Gilad Bloom #152 Match data Jan 2, 1987* R32 Adelaide International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dan Goldie #738 #27 457 1,855 122 117 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilad Bloom Dan Goldie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0 1984 7–4 63.6% #101 1,615 0 0
21 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0 1985 3–9 25.0% #265 1,603 0 0
22 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0 1986 8–10 44.4% #113 1,658 0 0
23 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0 1987 24–19 55.8% #50 1,765 0 1
24 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0 1988 36–19 65.5% #29 1,800 0 2
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0 1989 12–14 46.2% #67 1,735 0 2
26 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0 1990 24–26 48.0% #96 1,658 0 2
27 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% #181 1,574 0 2
28 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilad Bloom Dan Goldie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1989 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9% — 79 69 148 53.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 19 16 35 54.3% 20 20 40 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 68/80 of Gilad Bloom's and 21/23 of Dan Goldie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilad Bloom Dan Goldie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 1991 34/39 2.1 2.3 62.5% 66.8% 48.2% 55.3% 43.3% 59.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 24/29 2.3 3.0 64.5% 64.6% 49.2% 56.2% 42.2% 59.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1993 5/6 2.0 3.4 66.2% 67.9% 46.4% 57.3% 53.1% 60.5% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 4/5 3.0 1.5 60.9% 62.6% 47.4% 46.3% 43.1% 56.5% 41.9% 1991 21/23 3.2 7.7 52.3% 69.1% 45.8% 58.5% 42.0% 57.8% 35.2%
28 1995 1/1 0.0 1.0 46.3% 60.0% 34.5% 50.0% 40.0% 46.3% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68/188 2.2 2.5 63.1% 65.8% 48.2% 55.1% 43.6% 59.1% 38.5% — 21/239 3.2 7.7 52.3% 69.1% 45.8% 58.5% 42.0% 57.8% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilad Bloom Dan Goldie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23 1983 1494 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.14
20 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.10 1984 1616 132.0 — — — — -12 -15 — 59.3% +0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.33
21 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.23 1985 1603 117.3 — — — — +16 -57 — 34.5% -0.90 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
22 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89 1986 1658 131.7 — — — — +38 -102 — 43.1% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.61
23 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.07 1987 1765 144.5 — — — — -2 — -38 52.1% +0.15 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.01
24 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 1988 1801 136.5 — — — — +24 — -130 57.8% +0.35 17–6 (74%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.07
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.91 1989 1735 130.2 — — — — -17 -245 +91 47.8% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.95
26 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15 1990 1658 132.5 — — — — +19 — +189 50.4% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.16
27 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05 1991 1575 122.7 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +54 — +181 35.6% -0.95 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.05
28 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87 — 1856 140.1 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +18 -98 +41 49.7% -0.08 53–37 (59%) 52–45 (54%) 107.4 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.