H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Eric Jelen H2H: 0-2
Eric Jelen holds a 2–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eric Jelen leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eric Jelen won the 1991 Auckland third round 6-3 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1991* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Eric Jelen | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Eric Jelen | 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eric Jelen | #1,153 | #23 | 575 | 1,805 | 124 | 127 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Eric Jelen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #31 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #76 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #47 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #118 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |