H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Jan Gunnarsson H2H: 0-1
Jan Gunnarsson holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Gunnarsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Gunnarsson won the 1991 Umag third round 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1991* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jan Gunnarsson | 7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Jan Gunnarsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |