Gilad Bloom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christo Van Rensburg | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 12, 1991 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 1994 | H2H |
| Jan Siemerink | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nov 13, 1992 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 16, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Joao Cunha Silva holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joao Cunha Silva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joao Cunha Silva won the 1994 Prague round of 32 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Cunha Silva | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Gilad Bloom | Match data | Aug 4, 1994* | R32 | Prague | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,749 | 83 | 105 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joao Cunha Silva | — | — | — | 1,547 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gilad Bloom | Joao Cunha Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #137 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Gilad Bloom | Joao Cunha Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1984 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1991 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1996 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 55 | 60 | 115 | 47.8% | 9 | 21 | 30 | 30.0% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | Career | 10 | 19 | 29 | 34.5% | 9 | 36 | 45 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Gilad Bloom | Joao Cunha Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1984 | 1504 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | +0.36 | 1988 | 1491 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 |
| 1985 | 1506 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 1989 | 1443 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.29 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.48 |
| 1986 | 1539 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 62.5% | +1.25 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.23 | 1990 | 1476 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | +28 | — | 31.8% | -1.41 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.29 |
| 1987 | 1546 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -44 | 0 | 40.5% | -0.92 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 104.6 | +2.10 | 1991 | 1428 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 22.2% | -1.37 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.8 | -0.10 |
| 1988 | 1550 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -16 | — | 41.2% | -0.45 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.1 | -0.23 | 1992 | 1482 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +14 | — | 44.4% | -0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | +1.36 |
| 1989 | 1570 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 40.7% | -0.41 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.89 | 1993 | 1501 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -50 | — | 34.8% | -0.78 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.4 | +0.63 |
| 1990 | 1736 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -224 | -113 | 50.0% | -0.05 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–5 (55%) | 106.2 | -0.07 | 1994 | 1480 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -43 | — | 33.3% | -1.25 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 1991 | 1635 | 129.6 | -1.33 | -0.10 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +36 | -169 | -26 | 43.3% | -0.34 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–8 (27%) | 89.1 | -1.07 | 1995 | 1465 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 1992 | 1662 | 122.5 | -2.20 | -0.46 | 0.933 | 48.8% | +11 | -173 | -51 | 48.7% | -0.14 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | 103.8 | +0.91 | 1996 | 1426 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +88 | -21 | — | 20.6% | -1.77 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–5 (0%) | 99.0 | +0.19 |
| 1993 | 1635 | 107.0 | +0.30 | +0.70 | 0.994 | 50.2% | +14 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.47 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1623 | 114.8 | +0.78 | +0.24 | 0.963 | 48.9% | — | -113 | — | 36.4% | -0.36 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1613 | 102.1 | +0.57 | -1.46 | 0.745 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1749 | 130.0 | -1.37 | -0.17 | 0.942 | 48.9% | +21 | -113 | -54 | 45.0% | -0.33 | 31–36 (46%) | 23–32 (42%) | 99.0 | +1.87 | Career | 1548 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -12 | — | 30.4% | -1.17 | 12–16 (43%) | 8–16 (33%) | 98.1 | +3.04 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christo Van Rensburg | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 12, 1991 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 1994 | H2H |
| Jan Siemerink | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nov 13, 1992 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 16, 1992 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 29, 1996 | — |
| Francisco Roig | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 26, 1993 | — |
| Felix Mantilla | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 9, 1996 | — |
| Omar Camporese | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 8, 1996 | — |
| Gianluca Pozzi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 26, 1996 | — |