H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Gilad Bloom vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-1

Gilad Bloom and John Fitzgerald are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1990 Australian Open round of 128 7-6 7-6 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilad Bloom #96 7-6 7-6 3-6 6-2 John Fitzgerald #103 Match data Jan 17, 1990* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
John Fitzgerald #30 7-6 6-4 4-6 7-6 Gilad Bloom #136 Match data Mar 16, 1988* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilad Bloom John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0
19 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0
20 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2
22 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4
23 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5
24 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6
28 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilad Bloom John Fitzgerald
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9% — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilad Bloom John Fitzgerald
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.18
20 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.10 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.46
21 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.23 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.60
22 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.37
23 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.07 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.73
24 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) — -2.02
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.91 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) — +0.24
26 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.81
27 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) — +2.51
28 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.14
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.41
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) — +0.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21
Career — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87 — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.