H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Mark Dickson H2H: 2-0
Gilad Bloom holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Dickson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gilad Bloom leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1987 Tel Aviv fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1987* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1986* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |