H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Pablo Arraya H2H: 1-0
Gilad Bloom holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Arraya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1991 New Haven second round 6-7(5) 6-1 4-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1991* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-7(5) 6-1 4-0 (ret.) | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Pablo Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |