H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gilad Bloom vs Simon Youl H2H: 1-0
Gilad Bloom holds a 1–0 lead over Simon Youl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1990 Seoul third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1990* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilad Bloom | 6-3 6-1 | Simon Youl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilad Bloom | Simon Youl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 |