H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Gilad Bloom vs Tomer Zimmerman H2H: 1-0

Gilad Bloom holds a 1–0 lead over Tomer Zimmerman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1984 Tel Aviv round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tomer Zimmerman
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilad Bloom #630 6-3 6-4 Tomer Zimmerman Match data Sep 13, 1984* R32 Tel Aviv ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tomer Zimmerman #1,119 #384 7 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilad Bloom Tomer Zimmerman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #676 1,484 0 0
19 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilad Bloom Tomer Zimmerman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9% — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilad Bloom Tomer Zimmerman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41 1984 1484 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
19 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) 106.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 103.8 +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87 — 1500 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +22.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.