H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Gilbert Schaller vs M. Petchey H2H: 0-1
M. Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over Gilbert Schaller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Petchey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, M. Petchey won the 1994 Mexico City fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1994* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | M. Petchey | 6-4 6-3 | Gilbert Schaller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert Schaller | #765 | #17 | 1,294 | 1,815 | 112 | 126 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gilbert Schaller | M. Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #48 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #20 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #97 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #302 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |